The MBTA Commuter Rail’s fares are based on the amount of zones traveled. Stations are placed in 1 of 11 zones, numbered 1 through 10, as well as Zone 1A for stations close to the Boston terminal stations (South Station and North Station). Fares are based on distance traveled, so Zone 1 has a cheaper fare than Zone 10. Interzone fares also exist for travelers not going all the way to Boston.
A major drawback of the Commuter Rail for some passengers is the expensive fares from outer zones. From Grafton, my local Commuter Rail station in Zone 8, it costs $12.25 to get into Boston one way. Wickford Junction, the only station in Zone 10, has a $13.25 one way fare, the most expensive in the network.
In this entire probably-long post, I’m reforming the entire damn fare system to make for better distance-based pricing on the network. I’m not touching interzone fares here, though. Not getting rid of zones either. Special thanks to those whose thoughts inspired the creation of this post. That would be Maz (for the idea of a fare zone reform), Cedric (for sharing an article about a proposal to unify fares in the Bay Area), Selig (for telling all of us how good Caltrain is with their fares), and Miles (for commenting on my Grafton post agreeing with the wackiness of the T’s fare zones).
To first explain what I’m going to base the zone reform off of, I need to discuss Caltrain in the Bay Area of California. Caltrain is a 77 mile long commuter rail line between San Francisco and Gilroy, California. Caltrain operates with 6 fare zones, numbered 1 through 6. This is the ideal system to look at for the fare zone reform.
There is also a slight mathematical process to determine all this as well. I took the furthest station in each fare zone, found the distance to the inbound terminal, and divided the price by that distance. I’ll call that number the price per mile for the zone. Caltrain is seen as the ideal system because Zones 2 through 6 have their price per mile all close to each other around $0.20 per mile. This can be fixed for Zone 1 by moving Millbrae and Broadway stations into Zone 1.
In this post, I’ll be comparing this to the MBTA’s Commuter Rail and Metra in Chicago. With both these systems, the price per mile decreases as you go further out of the inbound terminal. This provides some inequality, as fares closer to Boston and Chicago are proportionally higher than fares further away. This becomes a further issue when you look at the rapid transit networks in both Boston and Chicago. Both cities have transit lines that go into the outer zones and make it far cheaper to take local transit instead of the regional rail lines.
In Boston, the rapid transit network goes out to Zone 2 on a $2.40 fare. On the Commuter Rail, this costs $7 one way. Zones 1A, 1, and 2 have high prices per mile at $0.62, $0.82, and $0.61 on average, respectively. Zones 9 and 10 for comparison have prices per mile at $0.25 and $0.21, respectively. My proposal is to have a $2.40 fare for all travel within Zones 1A, 1, and 2. This would put the price per mile at $0.21. For Zones 3 through 10, their price per mile will be set to $0.21 per mile, and one way fares will be based proportionally. A table with the old and new fares is included at the end.
Metra also operates with 10 fare zones, lettered A through J. In Chicago, the rapid transit network goes out to Zone C on a $2.50 fare. On Metra, this costs $5.50 one way. Zones A, B, and C have high prices per mile at $1.13, $0.42, and $0.38 on average, respectively. Zones I and J for comparison have prices per mile at $0.21 and $0.17, respectively. My proposal, similar to the one I had for Boston, is to have a $2.50 fare for all travel within Zones A, B, and C. This would put the price per mile at $0.17. For Zones D through J, their price per mile will be set to $0.17 per mile, and one way fares will be based proportionally. A table with the old and new fares is also included at the end.
Also, I created a far more detailed spreadsheet for both Boston and Chicago if you’re interested.
Want to submit a comment? Find out how here.
Maz on January 24, 2022 at 10:51 pm: YO, I dig it! If the T fired up a suburban route, say Providence to Lowell via Worcester and Ayer, how would you suggest fares work for that?
Ben (in reply to Maz) on January 24, 2022 at 11:01 pm: That would be awesome, but would require a complete overhaul of how the zones are structured. Currently, the zones are based off of distance to Boston, and radiate outwards. Adding new zones 11 through whatever to show distance along a outer line could work.
Parker on January 25, 2022 at 7:38 am: I would like it
Cedric on January 25, 2022 at 4:27 pm: Fare zones in their current states are very wack, but they are also really easy to fix... Shoot Metra and Keolis an email maybe? Nice post!
Ben (in reply to Cedric) on January 25, 2022 at 4:34 pm: if i was gonna send this to anyone, it would be TransitMatters since this is right up their alley with their Regional Rail stuff. February 2, 2022: I did get a response from them and set up a time for them to call me with any questions. They never followed up confirming that time nor did they actually call me. I'm yet to follow up with them.